Image macros that make you laugh, cry, or both.

...You Lost Me · Post by **...You Lost Me** » Sun Jan 12, 2014 3:09 am

The baby's head moves before the skeleton punches him, I think.

DSMatticus · Post by **DSMatticus** » Sun Jan 12, 2014 3:45 am

...You Lost Me wrote:The baby's head moves before the skeleton punches him, I think.

Maybe, but have you realized that the baby is actually a ghost? The hand goes right through it.

Cynic · Post by **Cynic** » Sun Jan 12, 2014 5:42 am

[NSFW-ish, thonged man, dueling Octopus, Fritz Leiber]

I think chainmail bikini got gender bended in a hilarious way.

DSMatticus · Post by **DSMatticus** » Sun Jan 12, 2014 7:01 pm

I do not understand what is going on with the woman in purple's head. She looks like a creepy old manwitch with a unicorn horn and a goatee.

Josh_Kablack · Post by **Josh_Kablack** » Sun Jan 12, 2014 7:46 pm

While the Sea King's Away wrote:On the Mouser's side was a slimmer yet exquisitely feminine creature whose silver flesh seemed to merge into silver scales on shoulders, back and flanks under her robe of filmy violet and whose short dark hair was split back from her low forehead's center by a scalloped silver crest a hand's breadth high. She too showed the faint neck-scorings and finger-webs.

Maj · Post by **Maj** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 7:17 pm

Shrapnel · Post by **Shrapnel** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:20 am

Best. Comic. EVER.

ubernoob · Post by **ubernoob** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:11 am

Maxus · Post by **Maxus** » Sun Jan 19, 2014 5:59 pm

OgreBattle · Post by **OgreBattle** » Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:53 am

OgreBattle · Post by **OgreBattle** » Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:54 am

Josh_Kablack · Post by **Josh_Kablack** » Tue Jan 21, 2014 10:57 pm

Thought the resemblance was strong enough that I made this:

The name is also a perfect Adam-Westian transparent cover for the Joker.

Koumei · Post by **Koumei** » Wed Jan 22, 2014 12:22 am

I don't actually know who that guy is. Also, one member of the Republican party (or an affiliate who makes sure people vote R) did that with Obama being compared unfavourably to the Joker. Yes really. The same one that also put "Abortions should only be legal retroactively after the birth" in his blog.

Stahlseele · Post by **Stahlseele** » Wed Jan 22, 2014 1:02 am

so . . he was, technically then, advocating infanticide? O.o

DSMatticus · Post by **DSMatticus** » Wed Jan 22, 2014 1:09 am

It's Arthur Laffer. I had to snip out his face and reverse image search him to find that out, which is slightly embarrassing. But he's the dude that provided the academic justification for the economics that the Republican party (edit: I probably shouldn't say "conservative party," what with places that aren't here actually having things that are called that) adopted in the 70's (not the actual reason, which was of course just simple corruption and a desire to pander to the wealthy and elite for their support). You've heard of him because of the Laffer Curve, which despite virtually everyone credible believing to be >65%, conservatives have been trotting out to justify tax cuts as always, always, always, always, always, ALWAYS revenue increasing for 30+ years, no exceptions, LET THE GOLDEN SHOWER TRICKLE COMMENCE.

Koumei · Post by **Koumei** » Wed Jan 22, 2014 2:16 am

Stahlseele wrote:so . . he was, technically then, advocating infanticide? O.o

Or flat-out murder of adults. Note that this is basically always what the "pro-life" people want: you can't let something die while it's feeding off its mother-to-be, but once it's born, you can ignore it and let it die just fine, or indeed go ahead and kill it. See also: they support war, the death penalty, and giving guns to absolutely everyone.

Orion · Post by **Orion** » Wed Jan 22, 2014 3:38 am

I'm pretty sure Demoncrats are the conservative party in the US. What with wanted to maintain the continuity of institutions like insurance companies, federal agencies, or Congress.

Longes · Post by **Longes** » Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:15 am

Kaelik · Post by **Kaelik** » Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:49 pm

Was there supposed to be a point to any of that?

I especially thought the picture of a vaguely kinda overweight guys shoulder was hilarious and not at all completely incomprehensible why anyone would post it.

Stahlseele · Post by **Stahlseele** » Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:59 pm

i did not get that either.

Longes · Post by **Longes** » Fri Jan 24, 2014 1:10 pm

Kaelik wrote:Was there supposed to be a point to any of that?

I especially thought the picture of a vaguely kinda overweight guys shoulder was hilarious and not at all completely incomprehensible why anyone would post it.

It's a gallery of weird pictures people post on the internet.

Kaelik · Post by **Kaelik** » Fri Jan 24, 2014 1:59 pm

Longes wrote:
Kaelik wrote:Was there supposed to be a point to any of that?

I especially thought the picture of a vaguely kinda overweight guys shoulder was hilarious and not at all completely incomprehensible why anyone would post it.
It's a gallery of weird pictures people post on the internet.

Except that a lot of them are not weird. Like the one of a guy on a subway, being on a subway. That is not weird. Or the one of words in the grass in the hill in front or a person standing in front of a confessional. Or the one of a different guy on a different subway. Or the one of words written in chalk on the ground.

Oh those wacky people on wacky subways going to locations. Haha. Man, subways. Hilarious.

Longes · Post by **Longes** » Fri Jan 24, 2014 2:08 pm

Kaelik wrote:
Longes wrote:
Kaelik wrote:Was there supposed to be a point to any of that?

I especially thought the picture of a vaguely kinda overweight guys shoulder was hilarious and not at all completely incomprehensible why anyone would post it.
It's a gallery of weird pictures people post on the internet.
Except that a lot of them are not weird. Like the one of a guy on a subway, being on a subway. That is not weird. Or the one of words in the grass in the hill in front or a person standing in front of a confessional. Or the one of a different guy on a different subway. Or the one of words written in chalk on the ground.

Oh those wacky people on wacky subways going to locations. Haha. Man, subways. Hilarious.

Darn. I should be more picky with the intercultural entertainment. The guy on the subway uses an incredible magic of turning И into N.

Kaelik · Post by **Kaelik** » Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:33 pm

Longes wrote:Darn. I should be more picky with the intercultural entertainment. The guy on the subway uses an incredible magic of turning И into N.

Both of the two guys on subways? Wow, that still isn't a joke, or funny. Haha, Somebody used the letter U to represent the word U. It is funny for reasons.